Find a musician friend with a chromatic tuner. You won't have to rely on
determining pitch with an untrained ear.

CB
An audio engineer with "Trained ears" :-)

Quoting Dave Tutelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> At 02:15 AM 10/15/04 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >In a message dated 10/12/2004 2:16:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >>The ball matches the club head of No. 1 the best. If you can get the 
> >>natural frequency of the ball to be the same as the natural frequency of 
> >>the face you will get the best smash...
> >
> >Do you know of a way to measure a balls natural freq. and a club face's as 
> >well, if so that could be huge in fitting.
> 
> The clubhead is easier than the ball. Here's how I've measured the 
> clubhead's natural frequency a few times in the past.
> 
> Sitting near a piano, tap the middle of the clubface with something hard, 
> preferably something metal. The hard tapping tool should be something that 
> won't resonate itself; first tap it against something hard, and make sure 
> it "thuds" instead of "rings". If it rings, your ear will have two tones 
> (the clubhead and the tapping tool) to confuse it.
> 
> OK, tap the clubface and listen to the ring you get. As if you were tuning 
> an instrument, alternately tap the clubface and play a note on the piano, 
> until you have the same tone. Now look up that note in a reference book 
> that translates notes to frequency. (Tables of musical scales are pretty 
> common in science reference books and some music reference books as well.) 
> Now you know the frequency to some reasonable degree. It doesn't have to be 
> too precise, because the ball's resonance peak is quite broad.
> 
> Problems with this method:
>   * You need something of an ear for music. In particular...
>   * You need to be able to hear which octave a note is in, or you can be 
> off by a factor of two or more.
>   * Modern drivers with big spring faces have more of a "clank" than a 
> "ring". (Drivers from five years ago were much easier to measure.) That 
> means that the tone is polluted by harmonics. Your ear has to be good 
> enough to hear the fundamental and match the fundamental to a note on the 
> piano.
> 
> Finding the resonant frequency of the ball will take a lot more thought. 
> Maybe somebody else knows how. A strobe series just after impact (like the 
> one in Bernie's collection from Spalding) might be an approach, but I think 
> the precision would nor be very good.
> 
> Cheers!
> DaveT
> 



Reply via email to