Colin, you hit upon one of my shortcuts :)
Mark A Patton [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Colin Dick Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 4:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: ShopTalk: MOI Matching The problem with 0.4" is it isn't a definate mark on the ruler. I haven't gone MOI yet, but I did note that 1 cm= 0.3937008", really close to Dave T's 0.4". It would be worth your while to buy a ruler with cms. marked on it for MOI matching. This would be better than 1/4" which is only .25", or staying with .5" which is 25% more than 0.40" Colin Colin Dick- GCA Accredited Professional Clubmaker SpineMaster Mk.II And Spining Information on http://members.shaw.ca/cgdick/ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Stephens Sent: April 19, 2005 12:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ShopTalk: MOI Matching Someone will probably beat me to this, but if you check Dave Tutelman's site, you will find that using a spacing of 0.4" per club rather than 0.5" will also approximate a MOI match. If the 6i were your standard, then the 3i would be shorter than normal by just over 1/4", and the pw would be longer than normal by less than 1/2". Chances are your golfer would never know unless you told him. Also you may want to check a few of the lighter graphite iron shafts. I think you'll find a few where the balance point is noticeably closer to the tip than a steel shaft would be. That allows you to reduce weight and keep the swingweight (or MOI) up without having to lengthen the club too much. Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 10:39 am Subject: Re: ShopTalk: MOI Matching > Alan, > > I really appreciate your input on this, after doing searches for > the subject in the forums I can see that you understand my dilema. > I the first variable working against me is the use of graphite > shafts, standard headweights require quite a bump in headweight to > use graphite, but because of the golfers problems with tedonitis, > the graphite benefits outweigh their shortcomings. > Secondly the golfer is 5'8", its' probably not the best idea to > let lengths get way out there. > Thirdly, I hate to build a new set of irons for someone and have > to use lead tape, therefore I'm held to a 13 gram max, using 9 > gram hosel and 4 gram tip weights. > After all the figuring and re-figuring trying to work within those > parameters, I get back to my basic swingweight chart, and it tells > me that an 1/2" decrease in length results in a 3 point > swingweight loss, but the 7 gram increase throughout the set in > headweight results in a 3.5 point gain, therefore I have a 1/2 > swingweight point gain thru any set using the same shafts and > grips. But I cannot find a swingweight calculator that will bear > this out. > > I appreciate your comments, > > Mark > > > -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 4/21/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 4/21/2005
