Lloyd,

That is the maximum theoretical gain by going from 43.5" to 45".  However,
if you start looking at other factors, like % of shots on-center, the
average distance may well be better at the shorter length.

Tedd

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lloyd Hackman
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 5:22 PM
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Wishon Short Driver Article


Tedd

Yes, but you would give up that distance. The club head velocity is a
function of Radius squared thus giving you a 4.6% increase in club head
speed. At 100 mph that woud mean 11.5 yards.

llhack


> [Original Message]
> From: Childers, Tedd A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <ShopTalk@mail.msen.com>
> Date: 10/12/2005 4:34:08 PM
> Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Wishon Short Driver Article
>
> Lloyd,
>
> I think Tom's point is that even with perfectly matched shafts, the
shorter
> driver is easier to hit on-center than the longer driver.  This is PURELY
a
> function of length.  Longer = more difficult to hit on-center.  Now, your
> point may be valid that a well matched shaft will make it easier to hit a
> longer club on-center, but it will be even easier to hit a shorter club
with
> a well matched shaft.  The distance gain that a 45" driver offers over a
> 43.5" driver is negligible (probably around 5-7 yards).  Personally, I
would
> love to build a shorter driver, but ideally I could get a reasonable
> swingweight (D2-D4) at 43.5-44" and with a very light shaft (60 grams).
> This would require a heavier than normal driver head (210+ grams), and
that
> is what I have a problem finding, at least in a model that has the specs I
> want (450+ cc, ~12* loft). 
>
> Tedd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lloyd Hackman
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 3:44 PM
> To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
> Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Wishon Short Driver Article
>
>
> Tom 
>
> Why should I do it with length when selecting the proper frequency shaft
> provides the best accuracy and distance and the player has already decided
> to play with the longer club. The primary reason people have had trouble
> with longer shafts in the past is because no one provided a way of
matching
> the shaft timing except by trial and error, which is not easy and lacks in
> sufficient choices when using the standard A,L,R,S and X shafts. We have
> been changing a lot of shafts in the R7's and callaway's and putting the
> same length shaft back in but at a fitted frequency with great success. I
> had one player a 5 handicap bring me a new Callaway driver and want me to
> put a stiff shaft in it. He claimed he could not keep it in the fairway
and
> because the industry would tell him to go to a stiffer shaft or like you
> would tell him to go to a shorter shaft, he brought me a stiffer shaft to
> put in the club for him. I told him I don't do it that way because I was
> not sure that the stiffer shaft was what he needed. I told him I preferred
> to do a fitting and make a recommendation because when some one is
changing
> a shaft it should be to get the best they can get. I ended up recommending
> a frequency 7 CPM lower and could only find a shaft at the time to put in
> the club that made it 5 CPM lower then what he had, he decided to give it
a
> try. He called back two days later and said that he had played 18 holes
> that day and never missed a fairway!!!
>
> llhack
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Tom Wishon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <ShopTalk@mail.msen.com>
> > Date: 10/12/2005 2:55:47 PM
> > Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Wishon Short Driver Article
> >
> > LLHack:
> >
> > Fine Lloyd - you just keep on ignoring the simple fact that longer
> > length does not match well with golfer athletic ability and does result
> > in one heckuva lot of avg golfers having one heckuva lot of trouble
> > keeping the club under control and on a reasonably proper swing path and
> > plane.  Better yet, why don't you do both?  Do your chip thing to
> > satisfy your own beliefs but do it with a length definitely shorter than
> > 45" for your golfers.  
> >
> > TOM  
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Lloyd Hackman
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 10:44 AM
> > To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
> > Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Wishon Short Driver Article
> >
> > I am sorry but the Wishon article starts right off with the wrong
> > premise.
> > He throws in the premise that the shorter the club the better the
> > accuracy.
> > He ignores the fact that the real parameter for accuracy is shaft
> > frequency. If you can match the proper shaft frequency to the players
> > swing
> > and get the shaft back to straight and square for him he will then have
> > the
> > best combo of distance and accuracy. Of course stiffening or shortening
> > the
> > shaft will improve accuracy just because you have restrained the shaft
> > from
> > flexing as much and the head moving with respect to the shaft as much.
> > Timing the shaft with the swing to get it back to straight and square is
> > the answer. Accuracy is the primary benefit that the player recognizes
> > when
> > I fit them. I do not have to change the driver length from what the
> > player
> > has ben playing but just select the proper shaft frequency to get the
> > shaft
> > back to straight and square. I personally play a 48" driver at my height
> > of
> > 5' 10" and confound all of those I play with at how accurate I am. I am
> > hitting better then 85% of the fairways.
> >
> > llhack
> >
> >
> > > [Original Message]
> > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <shoptalk@mail.msen.com>
> > > Date: 10/12/2005 10:01:47 AM
> > > Subject: ShopTalk: Wishon Short Driver Article
> > >
> > > Found this great article from pga.com that Tom wrote on playing 
> > > shorter drivers.
> > > http://www.pga.com/improve/tips/equipment/improve_wishon080304.cfm
> > >
> > > What kind of experience have you guys have building 43-44" drivers?
> > > -- 
> > >
> > > John Muir
> > > shoptalk
> > > http://clubmaker-online.com
> > > http://gripscience.com
> > > http://elevongolf.com
> > > 810.923.7396
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>




Reply via email to