Well, I've been at this game for nearly 60 years and given the equipment I used 
then compared to what I use now? I'm still hitting the 7 iron nearly the same 
distance I hit it from way back when. Why? For sure it isn't because I'm 
stronger. It's because of shaft technology, head design, grip design, head 
lofts and lies. My old Spalding irons were as unforgiving as any club could be. 
Today, my Callaway clones make the ball go straight and far even with mis-hits. 
As most of you old-timers here may recall, I'm devoted to empirical knowledge. 
Build the "perfect" club in theory, then go hit it. If it works, the theory is 
correct. The short answer to the question then, is; the "evidence" is clear. 
Just look at the vast number of golfers who are playing at levels near to what 
they played at years ago. Its so obvious that I'm astounded the question is 
even asked. 
USGA and R&A are in a constant battle with manufacturers to limit the design 
parameters of balls and clubs. Today's equipment clearly makes for better golf. 
And by the way; my 1946 5 iron loft  was 32 degrees. My current 5 iron's loft 
is 27 degrees. I hit both of them the same distance. 
TFlan

Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:43:59 -0400
To: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Subject: ShopTalk: Equipment question




Equipment question
A friend of mine
sent me this question and I thought I'd pass it along to the group,
any ideas?
John




Is there any
evidence that a player achieving a certain swing speed (say 116 miles
an hour or more) can gain an advantage with today's golf
equipment?


-- 





skype: jhmuir

AIM: [email protected]

810.923.7396

http://clubmaker-online.com

http://gripscience.com

http://clubmaker.mobi

http://thedriverstudio.com



Golf equipment updates at http://twitter.com/golfcast



Facebook--
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Clubmaker-Online/181867993392?v=wall&mid=20b6914G6046d421G0G66



sponsored by the new Aldila RIP BETA

http://www.clubmaker-online.com/products/aldila.rip.html











                                          

Reply via email to