Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 09:57:00AM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: > >> e) The script includes an implicit "package Shorewall::User;". > > Can you do that to the regular extension scripts too?
Done. > I anticipate > that the "normal" way to use this will be to write all your code in > the initdone(?) script (or suck it in there via 'use') and just call > functions using the single-line variant, so you'd want them all to be > in the same package. I've added a 'compile' compile-time user exit. It gets invoked early in the compilation process. > > > Also, while we're on the subject, please stick: > > unshift @INC, @config_dirs; > > somewhere early in the compiler, so that 'use' searches them. Done. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
