Tom Eastep wrote: > Steven Jan Springl wrote: >> Prior to the application of the above patches, specifying a mark value of 1 >> in >> the providers file was allowed. >> After the application of the patches, a mark value of 1 is no longer >> allowed. >> I have tried setting all combinations of Yes and No in WIDE_TC_MARKS and >> HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS. >> Is this expected? >> > > No, it is not. I'll try to have a look this evening.
This should be corrected by dcee6562a29ce4f7aac353cf1cb87c2814c7522a. Thanks Steven, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
