On 9/11/10 6:32 AM, Mr Dash Four wrote: > Possible bug, though I do not know whether it is Shorewall- or > ipset-related. > > The following statement in my rules file used to work with the previous > version of Shorewall (again, I don't remember whether the ipset version > has also changed since the last built): > > ACCEPT $FW:+vpn-local-port net:+vpn-ec2-hosts[dst,dst] udp
The alternative syntax "+vpn-ec2-hosts[2]" generates the correct iptables-restore input. I'll fix handling of the above for RC1. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
