On Sunday 29 May 2011 21:46:09 Steven Jan Springl wrote: > On Sunday 29 May 2011 16:26:11 Tom Eastep wrote: > > On 5/29/11 8:03 AM, Tom Eastep wrote: > > > I actually prefer this patch. It allows you to specify negative numbers > > > for the masks (which may be helpful) and converts them into 32-bit hex > > > numbers. > > > > Three's the charm, I guess. > > > > -Tom > > Tom > > Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. It's been a bit chaotic here > today. > > I can confirm the patch works. I can also confirm the UID patch works. > Thanks. > > Steven. >
Tom When tcrules file contains: IPMARK(dst,0X880,0xcc00,124) $FW eth1 the following messages are produced: Argument "0X880" isn't numeric in bitwise and (&) at /usr/share/shorewall/Shorewall/Tc.pm line 334, <$currentfile> line 15. Argument "0xcc00" isn't numeric in bitwise and (&) at /usr/share/shorewall/Shorewall/Tc.pm line 340, <$currentfile> line 15. Steven. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
