On 04/09/2013 09:10 AM, Mr Dash Four wrote:
> 
>>> Erm, you've lost me.
>>>
>>> On one hand you are "requiring protocol and port numbers", but on the 
>>> other "the only columns that are required are SOURCE and DEST" - that's 
>>> a bit contradictory. So to just make it clear - if I specify "INLINE $FW 
>>> net ; -p tcp --dport 1234 -m mickey-mouse --name foo -j SECCTX --name 
>>> foo2" or "INLINE $FW net ; -j SECCTX --name foo2", would that be OK with 
>>> shorewall (provided I've included "SECCTX builtin" in my "actions", of 
>>> course)?
>>>
>>>     
>>
>> Sorry -- I'm trying to do 12 things at once. I am *not* requiring any
>> columns except SOURCE and DEST. Your examples would work fine.
>>   
> Got it. You are not the only one with that particular problem though and 
> I sympathise with you completely.
> 
> I have one last query for you: if I specify "INLINE $FW net tcp 1234 ; 
> -p udp --dport 1235 -j SECCTX --name foo" what would happen? Would 
> shorewall issue an error, or would shorewall process one statement over 
> the other (which one?) and issue a warning?

That will generate an error.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-devel mailing list
Shorewall-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel

Reply via email to