Mike Lander wrote:
> But this tcrule is silly; you are never going to forward ESP packets are 
> you?
> 
> Chain tcfor (1 references)
>  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source 
> destination
> 
>     0     0 MARK       esp  --  eth0   *       0.0.0.0/0 
> 0.0.0.0/0
>         MARK set 0x2
> 
> -Tom
> 
> 
> I took some rules from openswan list this guy was using one Isp
> He was asked the same question. I am removing ah and esp rules now.
> 

Mike -- this SNAT rule (from /etc/shorewall/masq) cannot be good.

Chain eth0_masq (1 references)
 pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination

    0     0 SNAT       all  --  *      *       66.224.62.118        0.0.0.0/0
        policy match dir out pol none to:67.183.187.44

It looks like you have:

eth0    66.224.62.118  67.183.187.44

The addresses are in the wrong columns!!! That is why you are getting that
bizarre connection tracking entry. The proper entries are:

eth1    66.224.62.118  67.183.187.44
eth0    67.183.187.44  66.224.62.118

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key   \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to