[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hopefully this hasn't been asked a number of times.. I did some searching, 
> and didn't come up with anything initially.

This is actually Shorewall FAQ #2 but it is disguised enough that you probably
didn't recognize it.

> 
> Here is my info (modified sightly to make safe to broadcast):

So you believe in "security by obscurity"...

> Masq:  (not sure if this is necessary..)
> eth0                    0.0.0.0/0       175.31.30.10

It *is* necessary.

> 
> When I try to ftp to the box from the outside (72.36.210.44), the 
> connection is refused, and the following is in the log:
> 
> Nov 10 16:25:17 revproxy kernel: Shorewall:FORWARD:REJECT:IN=eth0 OUT=eth0 
> SRC=72.36.210.44 DST=10.111.46.4 LEN=60 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x00 TTL=48 
> ID=61493 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=51483 DPT=21 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0A

From the answer to Shorewall FAQ 17 (Why are these packets being
Dropped/Rejected?/How do I decode Shorewall log messages?):

        If the chain is FORWARD and the IN and OUT interfaces are the same, then
        you probably need the 'routeback' option on that interface in
        /etc/shorewall/interfaces or you need the 'routeback' option in the
        relevant entry in /etc/shorewall/hosts.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key   \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to