Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 10:11:04AM -0800, Tom Eastep wrote:
>> Helder Gaspar Rodrigues wrote:
>>> Yes that are packet being dropped:
>>> qdisc ingress ffff: ----------------
>>>  Sent 22676402 bytes 39464 pkt (dropped 244, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
>>>  rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>>>
>>> why?
>> The ingress qdisc is very imprecise. That is why the Shorewall traffic 
>> shaping
>> instructions tell you to tune your IN-BADNWIDTH.
> 
> That reminds me of a related question - tcdevices (and the html
> documentation) says this:
> 
> #                       If you don't want any traffic to be dropped set this
> #                       to a value faster than your interface.
> 
> But why can't I tell shorewall just to not bother creating an ingress
> qdisc at all?

Patches (and updated documentation) cheerfully accepted.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key   \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to