Brian Neu wrote: > tried this once before on: Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:43:28 -0800 (PST) >
I don't understand why you are seeing the behavior that you are seeing. OTOH, NAT-T was invented for a reason (the reason being that NAT of IPSEC doesn't work reliably). So I suggest that you implement NAT-T between these gateways or move the local gateway to the firewall system. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
