On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 12:10 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: > > The Shorewall Multi-ISP documentation clearly states that what Shorewall > provides is based on static routing and doesn't even attempt to deal > with dynamic change.
Yeah.
> It you don't like it, you are free to use something
> else.
Of course.
I have just been thinking over the last week or two on how to bring the
two closer together.
On a somewhat related note there is this statement in the multi-isp
document:
If you are using /etc/shorewall/providers because you have
multiple internet connections, we recommend that you specify
'balance' even if you don't need it. You can still use entries
in /etc/shorewall/tcrules to force traffic to one provider or
another.
What's the reasoning behind this? I'm assuming that if I don't use
balance, I don't get a default route through all providers?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
