Hi,

Simon Hobson wrote:
> Jim Duda wrote:
> 
>> The SIP clients are configured to interface with the private 
>> 192.168.0.X address on the firewall.  The clients are all
>> external to the firewall on the local LAN.  I would have only 
>> expected NAT to have been performed if the SIP clients
>> where attempting to access something external in the internet.
> 
> I agree, so it looks like the sip nat module is getting involved when 
> it shouldn't.

I just ran into this bug, which seems at least related:

   https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=522

Should be fixed in 2.6.20, and it also mentions a work-around by issuing:

   iptables -t raw -A PREROUTING -j NOTRACK

HTH,
-- 
  - Pieter

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to