Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 15:04 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:

> Patch attached. The calculation for r2q is pretty basic... the (kbits /
> 200) is a compromise to try and get decent quantum values for rates
> between 1mbit and 100mbit. This gives quantum ~25,000 for speed "full",
> and ~2500 for speeds "full/10". For rates < 1mbit I limit the minimum
> r2q to 5 and rely on the fact that the minimum quantum is limited to the
> device mtu. You can change the /200 to /400 to give quantum ~50,000 for
> "full", and by my calcs you should still stay under the 60,000 max, but
> I get the impression that high quantum's are a bad idea.
> 
> Note at one stage I had also changed the calculate_quantum() function to
> limit the output to 60000. However, this function is not used for the
> device root class, so it didn't fix the "quantum warning". With the r2q
> calc's you should never exceed 60,000 anyway...
> 
> The most useful addition IMHO is the ability to not define a default
> class, and have all unclassified traffic bypass TC.

Thanks. Unfortunately, this patch is against Shorewall 3.2. Shorewall 3.4 is
the current stable release and would be the earliest release that I would
consider adding these changes to.

I'll hack around with it when I have the time.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key   \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to