-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tom Eastep wrote:
> Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-19-04 at 07:12 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
>>> I'm lost. What is the difference between that and what HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=Yes
>>> does already (except for the width of the fields).
>> Nothing at all.  What I am proposing is in fact an emulation of
>> HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=Yes without using HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=Yes.
> 
>>> I believe that to do what
>>> you are proposing requires the same capabilities.
>> But doesn't require that the kernel/iptables support "both the extended
>> CONNMARK target and the extended connmark match capabilities" which my
>> kernel does not unfortunately:
> 
>> shorewall-lite show capabilities
>> ...
>>    Extended CONNMARK Target: Available
>> ...
>>    Extended MARK Target: Not available
>> ...
> 
> 
> Then I would suggest that you just patch out the one place in the code
> that requires that capability with HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=Yes.

Turns out that there are two places.

- -Tom
- --
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key   \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGJ6WbO/MAbZfjDLIRAj9hAJ0ZzQI95AiBUpgnHFxuZYVuB81pPwCgkVQL
ISAQ4jaKjWovYdSS8O1dL9M=
=I3qU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to