--- Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 'shorewall' package has been renamed
> 'shorewall-common'.
...
> In no case do you need to uninstall shorewall.
So shorewall < 4.0 and shorewall-common can coexist?
If I have shorewall-3.4.3 and want to upgrade to 4.0
then would I need to install shorewall-common-4 and
the shorewall-{compilers} ?
So my system would have:
shorewall-3.4.3
shorewall-common-4.0.0
shorewall-shell-4.0.0
shorewall-perl-4.0.0
Is that correct or would shorewall-3.4.3 have to be
uninstalled?
Somehow, I found that the naming continuity before
Beta 7 was more convenient.
Is there an advantage or necessity to introduce
shorewall-common?
____________________________________________________________________________________
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel
and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
