James Gray wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:24:49 am Tom Eastep wrote:
>> In helping a user on IRC today, I was dismayed to find that a bug that
>> was supposedly fixed in Shorewall 3.4.4 was not fixed. Furthermore, I
>> found that the bug is present as far back as 3.2.6 (I didn't look back
>> further since 3.2.6 was the release where the user (re-) discovered the
>> bug.
>>
>> If HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=No, then PREROUTING and OUTPUT marking rules are
>> behaving as if TC_EXPERT=Yes was specified in shorewall.conf. In other
>> words, these rules are being applied even if the connection has been
>> marked as being associated with a particular ISP.
> 
> Thanks for the patches Tom.  Are you releasing a new 3.4? 

Not for several weeks.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key   \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to