Mike Lander wrote: > > : /etc/shorewall/masq > : eth0 10.194.79.181 66.224.62.120 > : eth1 66.224.62.120 10.194.79.181 > : eth0 eth1 66.224.62.120 > : eth1 eth0 10.194.79.181
The last two entries appear to me to be totally silly. Please stop and think a minute about what those entries are asking the firewall to do. The first one says that "any traffic from a host with a route out of eth1 that is being forwarded out of eth0 should have its source address rewritten to 66.224.62.120". Why would any traffic be taking that path at all? The second rule is similar... Am I missing something? -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
