On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:20:22PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 04:59:30PM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote: > > - you must use IPSEC for VPN > > There are only two kinds of people who need ipsec: > > - those who have to interact with ipsec devices that they don't > control (usually manufactured by cisco) and can't replace > - those who are doing overcomplicated enterprise-level stuff > involving thousands of systems, and hence know what they're doing > and won't be here asking the question in the first place > > Everybody else should avoid it. It's usually like trying to swat a fly > with a cruise missile. > True. Another case, however, is the one where you want people to be able to connect from Mac or Windows clients and you want to support IPSEC+L2TP so that the built in clients will work. That would reduce the support burden since supporting road warriors can be tough.
Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
