Thanks Tom for the detailed reply ~ much appreciated! Just a quick question about your suggestion (b) - I did this thinking I could set a lower priority for traffic that I can't identify (since i've specified specifically which traffic I want higher priority on). Or should I not do this?
What happens to unspecified traffic if I remove the unconditional rule, in terms of priority? Thanks again, Terence On 22 Dec 2007, at 1:39 AM, Tom Eastep wrote: > I have three suggestions: > > a) Move the marking to the FORWARD chain. > b) Get rid of the unconditional rule that marks all packets with 1. > c) Except for the ipp2p rule, you only want to execute the other > marking > rules if the output interface is ppp0. > > HTH, > -Tom > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
