On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 13:12 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > I have the luxury of 64 public addresses and thus both sides of this > firewall have routable addresses. No NATing! (I am a co-author of RFC > 1918).
How ironic is it that a co-author of an RFC that if not expressly written for the purposes of, certainly is a linchpin to the usefulness of NAT doesn't need/use it. :-) Bring on the IPV6 numbering/roll-out so that we can all (those who choose to anyway) stop writing and using braindead NAT tools. Now back to your regularly scheduled Shorewall channel. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
