Andrzej Odyniec wrote:

> Here is a question: is there option to enable possibility of write zone name 
> instead interface name in any rules file for automatically duplication rules 
> for all interfaces in zone (or other method of groupping interfaces)? Or 
> maybe 
> exist other method to direct records about one interface automatically to 
> another?

I'll think about the notion of an 'interface group' -- I won't use zone
names. Zones are security objects and should not be used for specifying
packet rewriting. If I could design Shorewall over again, I wouldn't
even have DNAT and REDIRECT rules in the rules file but would rather
have a separate file for specifying DNAT/REDIRECT.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key   \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to