On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:57:28AM -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: > > I am willing to create a diff that would have this already done and I > > could submit this if the Shorewall crew would accept it. > > > > I don't like to have to maintain my own versions of this type of thing, > > it makes upgrading and management a nightmare. > > > > Please let me know what everyone thinks. > > Adding such a change would compound the felony. I would much prefer to get a > patch that changes the failing 'sed' command so that it works with both GNU > sed and your version of BusyBox 'sed'.
(To add the obvious...) So please tell us how it's actually breaking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
