This is what you said Tom Eastep > Scott Ruckh wrote: > >> >> So at this point I believe shorewall is out of the picture because any >> traffic going to a.b.c.0/24 >> should be going through the encrypted tunnel and shorewall would not do any >> filtering on this >> traffic. >> Is this a correct assumption? > > Yes. > >> >> I just want to make sure I am focusing my research in the right place. I >> don't think this is a >> shorewall issue, but I wanted to get a second opinion. > > Is there a firewall running on the XP box? Yes, but I turned it off and it did not make a difference.
The device (LinkSys NSLU2) running OpenVPN server is a single interface device which is NAT'd behind the LinkSysWRTG device. I have a working OpenVPN installation in routing mode where the OpenVPN server runs on the shorewall server, but this is my first bridge configuration where both OpenVPN client and OpenVPN server are NAT'd behind firewalls. Looks like I have a learning curve with the OpenVPN configuration and that would be off-topic for this list. Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
