On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:24:16AM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 00:55 +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > > Do it as a heartbeat resource script. That'll be pretty near > > transparent to shorewall, and farm all the hard work out to heartbeat. > > Hrm. Maybe my use of HA was misleading. I meant HA of multiple > Internet connections, not multiple Shorewall systems in an HA > configuration. > > Did you understand my use of HA to mean the latter?
Oh, yes, I habitually assume that you can't possibly do HA in one box (because you can't really, I get dead motherboards about as frequently as I get dead internet connections). I'm used to doing things vaguely like this: http://linuxman.wikispaces.com/Shorewall+basic+failover+with+heartbeat No idea if it makes any sense with one box (insofar as that makes any sense at all) - I'd never try, a second box is the cheapest element of the setup. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
