On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 16:45 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: > > I think that adding routing rules for things that need to use the main table > is more straightforward.
Indeed, if you know ahead of time and are able/willing to reload your firewall to deal with changes. > Plus your scheme would be incompatible with current > configurations. Which is also a problem. Because that means that we get to > support both the current scheme and your scheme. Yeah. I'm just looking for something that works more naturally with the world view that routing happens in the "main" table. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users