On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 16:45 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
> 
> I think that adding routing rules for things that need to use the main table 
> is more straightforward.

Indeed, if you know ahead of time and are able/willing to reload your
firewall to deal with changes.

> Plus your scheme would be incompatible with current 
> configurations. Which is also a problem. Because that means that we get to 
> support both the current scheme and your scheme.

Yeah.  I'm just looking for something that works more naturally with the
world view that routing happens in the "main" table.

b.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to