Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 16:41 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:Shorewall has nothing to do with set creation or maintenance.I wonder what the philosophical problem is with Shorewall creating an empty ipset if one doesn't exist already. Certainly I could put commands into the "init" (I think that would be the proper one) script to create the empty sets, but I wonder why Shorewall wouldn't want to do that as it comes across ipset usage in the configuration.
I'm not spending one minute on any new ipset functionality until ipsets are a part of official kernel.org kernels. And I'm not going to spend any time discussing the issue either.
-Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
