Tom Allison wrote: > > I thought USE_ACTIONS was a previous implementation and macros are the > favored method. So I'm not sure why USE_ACTIONS=No is not supported. > Maybe I'm reading too much into this? >
As clearly described in the shorewall.conf man page, USE_ACTIONS=No allows the disk (and RAM) footprint of Shorewall-shell to be reduced in embedded applications. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
