Matt LaPlante wrote: > Based on my reading of the DEST section of the rules man page > [http://www.shorewall.net/manpages/shorewall-rules.html], "Beginning > with Shorewall 4.1.4, the zone should be omitted in DNAT-, REDIRECT- > and NONAT rules." This seems to jive with a warning thrown by > shorewall-perl 4.2.6 when a zone is left in: > > Example: > DNAT- loc net:1.2.3.4:2525 tcp 25 > > Produces: > "WARNING: Destination zone (net) ignored : /etc/shorewall/rules" > > Ok, makes sense. But then, when the zone is actually omitted, things > go horribly wrong: > > Example: > DNAT- loc 1.2.3.4:2525 tcp 25 > > Produces: > "WARNING: Destination zone (1.2.3.4) ignored : /etc/shorewall/rules (line 459) > Can't call method "inet_htoa" without a package or object reference at > /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/IPAddrs.pm line 150, > <$currentfile> line 459." > > Is this a bug or a misinterpretation of the docs?
It is a case of Shorewall-perl neglecting to generate a fatal error for an absurd rule. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
