>>> I upgraded from 4.2.5 to 4.2.7  when running the    rpm -Uvh  command, 
I
>>> received serveral warning about a v3 signature  versus  a v4 
signature.
>>>
>>> I didn't see a mention in the upgrade notes, or my eyes could be worse
>>> than I thought...    Time to update  gpg.key ?
>> Don't know what to tell you. Nothing has changed here since 4.2.5 and,
>> according to the rpm man page:
>>
>>                 "For compatibility with older versions of GPG, PGP, and 
rpm,
>>                  only V3 OpenPGP signature packets should be 
configured."
>>
>> I have gpg configured to create V3 OpenPGP signatures (which is the
>> default).
>>
>> What does "rpm --checksig -p shorewall-common-4.2.7-0base.noarch.rpm"
>> display?
> 
> How about 'rpm -qip shorewall-common-4.2.7-0base.noarch.rpm' ?

You can disregard this request.

All Shorewall 4.2 rpms have a V4 signature. Shorewall 4.0 rpms beginning
 with 4.0.14 have V4 signatures. This change apparently occurred when I
upgraded this system to OpenSuSE 11.0. What version of rpm are you
using? My oldest RPM-based systems (OpenSuSE 10.3, Fedora 8) don't have
any problems with these RPMs

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

====================================================

# rpm -qa | grep rpm
rpm-4.1.1-71
warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature
warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature
#

# cat /etc/SuSE-release
SuSE Linux 9.0 (i586)
VERSION = 9.0
#

This box has been running so well, I haven't updated it...sigh, something 
else to do on the weekend.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to