Am Samstag, 5. Dezember 2009 15:18:16 schrieb Michael Weickel - iQom Business 
Services GmbH:
> http://www.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html
>
> Another way of channel bonding (MLP) could be load-sharing. Providers
> either support one of the given possibilities (MLP or load-sharing) or
> both.
>
> Maybe you can talk to them to route your public network (the provider
> aggregated one) to the ppp address of both lines. Then you and the provider
> must activate load-sharing (normally per packet, sometimes per session)
>
> You are mailing from Germany as I can see - I do not know any provider in
> Germany who does not support either MLP or Loadsharing. Of course if you
> are not buying from Tante Emma :-)
>
> Above mentioned guide will help you anyway if provider is not able to fit
> your needs.
>
> A way would be to separate your local subnet into two parts (not the subnet
> itself but regarding MASQ to outside) In addition you can use two routing
> tables, one with the default gw for first few hosts and second for second
> few hosts. With some additional scripting this would additionally provide a
> fallback solution where subnet hosts part one can use second line as long
> as its gone.
>
> Read the guide and a lot of questions will be answered by your own. If not,
> come back to the list.
>
>

Hi;

I've managed to deal with two adsl lines and the according interfaces ppp0 and 
ppp0 for incoming traffic. 
The multi-isp documentation was helpful.

There are two remaining problems:

1) The dsl are disconnected once a day so the remote gateway for ppp0 and ppp1 
changes after a unkown time (24hrs+x). This causes a sluggish connection from 
the loc zone to the internet. I do believe this is cause the route cache is 
not really refreshed after shorewall restart. A network restart 
with /etc/init.d/networking restart cures that symptoms though.

Will it help to run shorewall stop; ip route flush cache; shorewall start 
instead of of just restart shorewall? Any other ideas?

2) Due to the change if the pppx interfaces the origin ip-address of the smtp 
server changes as well, this may end up in false reverse lookups for the MX 
I'm afraid. 
I've read about route_rules to route smtp through a given provider. I'd like 
to route through a specific gateway adress, which isn't bound to a provider 
since the  providers are  both dynamic dsl/ppp lines....

Running
kernel 2.4.34
iptables 1.3.5
shorewall 4.0.15


Any help is appreciated
TIA
kp

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to