2010/4/21 Tom Eastep <[email protected]>:
> Pablo Sebastian Greco wrote:
>
>> If 192.168.1.x don't known about 192.168.2.x, they are forced to go
>> through 192.168.1.1 (shorewall box), and since 192.168.2.10 only knows
>> 192.168.2.1 (shorewall box), so everything should go through the
>> shorewall box and still maintain it's original IP
>
> Ah -- the '2' wasn't just a typo :-)
>
> Given that Santiago is moaning about changing the IP address of the
> server *within the 192.168.1.0 network*, moving it to another separate
> network would undoubtedly make him really howl.
>
> I think a better approach would be to simply move 192.168.1.1 from the
> shorewall box to the server while leaving 192.168.1.10 as its primary
> address. If course, that address might be used for other purposes
> besides the (wrong) proxy address, which would prevent that approach.

Its what actually i'm doing. :)

> -Tom
> --
> Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
> Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
> Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
> http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Shorewall-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to