On 7/2/10 7:09 PM, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
>> No. Netfilter doesn't support that so Shorewall can't support it either.
>>   
> As far as I can see, the only problem is the ctorigdst matching in the
> ACCEPT rule, which of course does not support ipsets.
> 
> Putting the redirect rule in the nat-table with the set-matching active
> is working - perhaps it would be possible to mark those packets that
> gonna be redirected and then filter them by that mark in the appropriate
> INPUT/FORWARD chains?

Sorry -- I'm not putting those kinds of hacks into Shorewall.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to