Hi Tom,

As I deployed 'blacklist' I missed a step shown in
http://www.shorewall.net/blacklisting_support.htm

"You specify the interfaces whose incoming packets you want checked against
the blacklist using the 
"blacklist"  option in /etc/shorewall/interfaces."

But this made no difference, proving to me that only and entry in
/etc/shorewall/hosts as shown below, 
is required with Shorewall version 4.4.10~Beta4-1 on Ubuntu

Kind regards,

Trent


-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Eastep [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, 5 July 2010 8:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm#faq84

On 7/4/10 5:49 PM, Trent O'Callaghan wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> I have tried Host file with:
> inet bond0:0.0.0.0/0!xxx.xxx.128.0/23,xxx.xxx.131.0/24        blacklist
> 
> This works and achieves the same result as breaking the 0.0.0.0/0 net 
> into two /1's
> 
> So I will stick with this method unless you come up with an update to 
> Shorewall so that 'blacklist' is not required in hosts.

Thanks, Trent.

4.4.11 will include a fix that will allow you to remove that workaround.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to