On 7/10/10 1:33 PM, Tom Eastep wrote: > On 7/10/10 1:10 PM, John McMonagle wrote: > >> >> Attached is a dump with heavy trafic and some opennms graphs of the same >> site. >> eth0 is local net. >> eth1 is internet. >> > > There is still very little traffic going through the qdiscs and no > queuing. Please forward your Shorewall TC configuration on this box.
Don't bother. I've taken another look at this and there is, indeed, quite a bit of incoming traffic (right below the OUT-BANDWIDTH on ifb0). But none of the classes is being driven to the point where queuing is occurring; that most likely means that queuing is happening at the up-stream router. Try dropping the OUT-BANDWIDTH of ifb0 by 10-20% and see if that helps or hurts. If it doesn't help, then I would try dropping the IN-BANDWIDTH of eth1 by a similar amount. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
