On 7/28/10 4:55 PM, Brad Clarke wrote: > http://www.shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html#GwFw > > I'm trying to set up a test of this, though a little less complex on > the ipsec side (manual keys, no racoon, only ESP on the tunneled > traffic between the private networks). I think I've screwed something > up, but I'll ask a stupid question first. > > Once I've done thing things on that page, should there automatically > be a route created on each shorewall box to send traffic between the > two private networks?
No. > Will NULL_ROUTE_RFC1918=Yes affect things? Only if you are trying to tunnel traffic to a remote RFC 1918 network. In that case, NULL_ROUTE_RFC1918 will break your configuration unless you add a static route to the remote network via your firewall's default gateway. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
