On 8/6/10 4:57 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > I guess I find this interesting because I'm always of the notion that > the bandwidth is there to be used, not limited and as long as QOS > requirements (i.e. VIOP, etc.) are being met and bandwidth is being > shared equally (which it should by default) why not let the users > use/have as much as they want/need?
Brian, Your approach and Thomas's are not incompatible. By using CONNBYTES, Thomas is able to move large uploads into a lower TC class. That doesn't mean that such uploads will be slower if there is no congestion. But when there *is* congestion, slowing down these large uploads can improve the upload experience for other users and reduce the overall bandwidth requirement for the site. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
