On 8/7/10 7:48 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 8/6/10 11:24 PM, Michael McCallister wrote:
> 
>>
>> I confirmed this rule load correctly and you can see it via "shorewall 
>> show nat"
>>
>>     26  1560 DNAT       tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            
>> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx      tcp dpt:43 to:192.168.1.6:4343-4344
>>
>> The problem however is that I am not seeing it "cause connections to be 
>> assigned to ports in the range in round-robin fashion", but rather it 
>> always sends the request to 192.168.1.6:4343.   192.168.1.6:4344 never 
>> sees any activity/requests.
>>
>> Any help/direction is appreciated,
> 
> Given that Shorewall is generating the correct iptables rule, there
> isn't anything that we can do to change the behavior.
> 
> You might try adding the :random option to see if that improves things.

It appears that RedHat's 3-4 year old kit doesn't support the :random
option (or at least the open source derivatives of REL5 don't seem to).

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to