On 9/7/10 3:27 PM, Mr Dash Four wrote: > Tom Eastep wrote: > >> I will consider a shorewall.conf (shorewall6.conf) option as a follow-on >> enhancement, but given how much more popular tcrules are than secmarks, >> I would probably add the enhancement for tcrules first. >> > No worries, just expressing my opinion - the decision, ultimately, is > for you to make, that's all.
Before I implement such a thing, I need to be sure that I understand all of the ramifications. I'm nowhere near that level of understanding with respect to SECMARK/CONNSECMARK. So I would prefer to implement very basic tools and then let user experience help drive where we go from there. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
