> First problem: if I remove the "balance" flag the local lan come back > to the TELE isp. Is it normal? I don't want balance the traffic among > the isp, but I can't get it work without this flag. > > Second problem: suppose to set the "balance" flag again (but, at the > end, I'd like to remove it). If I want the firewall use the same ALBA > isp I write (in tcrules):
I think there are some problems: I'm trying without "balance", and it sometimes works.. and sometimes no :-( tcrules: 9 eth0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 80 9 $FW 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 80 => eth0 through TELE (why?), $FW through ALBA (ok) 9 $FW 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 80 9 eth0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 80 => eth0 through ALBA (ok), $FW has timeout connections 9 eth0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 80 => eth0 through ALBA (ok), $FW through ALBA (why?) 9 $FW 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 80 => eth0 through TELE (ok), $FW through ALBA (ok) [empty] => eth0 through ALBA (???? ahah..), $FW through TELE (ok) This last configuration make me smile.. Can an open connection disturb the isp routing? An open chat, a you tube video.. while I'm restarting shorewall; with "tcrules" empty eth0 must go through TELE! In order to come back to the original routing I had to remove the "providers" file. I will try again in few days, after some night of sleep :-) Alessandro ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web. Learn how to best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
