Le 12/01/2011 19:10, Tom Eastep a écrit : > On 1/12/11 9:51 AM, Sam Przyswa wrote: >> Le 11/01/2011 15:38, Tom Eastep a écrit : >>> On 1/11/11 2:26 AM, Sam Przyswa wrote: >>>> Le 10/01/2011 20:08, Tom Eastep a écrit : >>>>> There are explicit instructions at >>>>> http://www.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html#Applications >>>> I configure as it explained on this page with a line in >>>> /etc/shorewall/tcrules: >>>> >>>> 1 $FW 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 25 >>>> >>>> to force the smtp traffic on provider 1 but with the "balance" option in >>>> /etc/shorewall/providers some smtp traffic go on provider 2 !? >>> http://www.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html#Local >> Ok I know this page but if I set HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=Yes I got an error: >> >> Checking /etc/shorewall/providers... >> ERROR: Invalid Mark Value (1) : /etc/shorewall/providers (line 10) >> > That section does not mention HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS!!! Why would you set that? > > The section does mention: > > a) Configuring your applications to bind to a specific local IP address. > b) It mentions a route_rule entry with SOURCE 'lo'.
Ok but as I said in my previous message with 'lo' in route_rules file all the tcrules setting become inactive. Please let me know (if it's possible) how to route ALL the port x traffic on the desired provider. Thanks in advance. Sam. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
