On 1/26/11 4:24 AM, Michele Petrazzo - Unipex wrote:
> Hi list,
> I need to block all the traffic to an ip, still leaving the forward in 
> ACCEPT mode, so I modified the rules file like:
> 
> REJECT     loc     net:1.1.1.1        all
> 
> but I continue to have access to that address (1.1.1.1).
> Seen the rules create, I see that my reject are never matched, also if I 
> try a "telnet 1.1.1.1 80"
> 
> Chain loc2net (1 references)
>   pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source 
> destination
>   5099  267K ACCEPT     all  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0 
> 0.0.0.0/0           ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED
>      0     0 reject     all  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            1.1.1.1
> 
> (I but a log rule at top and I see that it's matched and on the log:
> 
> IN=eth1 OUT=eth0 SRC=192.168.1.103 DST=1.1.1.1 LEN=60 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x00 
> TTL=63 ID=3081 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=55889 DPT=80 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
> 
> Now?

Are you using a proxy like Squid? If so, that is bypassing the rule.
Otherwise, please collect the output of 'shorewall dump' and submit it
along with the information requested at
http://www.shorewall.net/support.htm#Guidelines.

Thank you,
-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to