On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 15:52 +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 06:37 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 10:10 +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Could it be that the wildcard interface definition makes problems
> >> here?
> >> >
> >>
> >> I'll take a look. But adding the 'routeback' option to the interfaces
> >> entry is a workaround.
> >>
> >
> > The attached patch exempts wildcard interfaces from sfilter.
> 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Thanks for the quick patch, I'll test it ASAP.
> 
> I understand that the wildcard "+" is catched here but how would a
> wildcard like "eth+" work in this case?

It works okay, although it generates a rule in the INPUT chain that I'm
surprised is accepted by iptables/Netfilter. A second patch is
forthcoming that eliminates that rules.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to