On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 06:05 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 09:26 -0300, Ricardo Rios - Shorewall List wrote: > > > Hi Tom, sorry if i re-open this, i have another issue now, i dunno if > > is something of shorewall or the tproxy support. > > It's your configuration. You don't have an ACCEPT rule for port 80 from > lan to fw.
And please let me know if that works so I can update the HOWTO. I didn't have the software to properly test TPROXY support when I developed it, so I could only verify that it was generating the same rules as were recommended in the HOWTO that I followed. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
