Er, uhhhhh. Lemme rephrase. How would one handle multiple bridges and keep
playing nice with shorewall?
(I don't really have a plan B)
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse my brevity.
Brian W. Neu
Advanced Open Systems, Inc.
404-452-0043 (m)
Tom Eastep <[email protected]> wrote:
On Nov 1, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Brian W. Neu wrote:
> I've spent a lot of time going through different suggestions for
> shorewall with libvirt, but I haven't yet come across someone trying to
> do what I am doing, and the "best practice" isn't jumping out at me.
>
> The server has both an external interface (eth0) and an internal
> (eth1). Libvirt's default interface of virbr0 comes up with the
> 192.168.122 subnet. Right now I'm just routing between it, but I'd like
> for some virtual guests to be bridged to eth0, some to eth1, and some to
> remain on virbr0 or even a future virbr1,2,x.
>
> The system is Fedora 15.
>
> Advice on best practices for multiple bridges?
I have no recommendation. I gave up on libvirt a couple of years ago.
-Tom
Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
RSA® Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_____________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA® Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
