Think I found the issue - not shorewall.

http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5231

On 12/12/2011 9:51 AM, Alan Madill wrote:
> I don't know if this is a Shorewall issue or not.  We have a newly built 
> router
> with multiple vlans, dual isp.  Twice now we have seen the network slow to a
> crawl with ping times of 500ms to the next device on one of the ISP vlan's.  A
> reboot clears the problem.  This is in the logs just prior to the reboot.  I
> just upgraded the selinux_policy and I'll wait to see if it happens again.
>
> Dec 12 08:38:41 wanrouter kernel: __ratelimit: 10 callbacks suppressed
> Dec 12 08:38:41 wanrouter kernel: type=1400 audit(1323707921.637:68370): avc:
> denied  { sys_module } for  pid=24399 comm="ip" capa
> bility=16  scontext=system_u:system_r:ifconfig_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> tcontext=system_u:system_r:ifconfig_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=capabil
> ity
>
> Any suggestions as to which tree to bark up?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn Windows Azure Live!  Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011
> Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for
> developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it
> provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online.
> Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure
> _______________________________________________
> Shorewall-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Windows Azure Live!  Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011
Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for 
developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it 
provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online.  
Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to