Christ Schlacta wrote:
>So, I'm looking to set up a virtual router on my vlan enabled network. 
>I've got the modem on vlan 5, the LAN on vlan 10, and a guest vlan on
>vlan 20.  I'm sufficiently certain that, barring the addition of the
>necessary shorewall rules to accomidate a virtual router, my vm host is
>sufficiently secure for hosting the border router as a virtual machine.

Done something similar myself.
Obviously there is no guarantee that someone won't find a hole (bug) 
somewhere and exploit it. But then that also applies to dedicated 
hardware routers as well.

Other than that, it's a case of making sure that your policies and 
rules adequately lock down the network (particularly guest). I did 
set one up with 32 "client" VLANs for a business centre. The list of 
rules and policies grew quite quickly as I wanted to hide the other 
guests completely - so you have to block access from client networks 
to the router addresses on other networks, while still allowing 
access to the clients interface. Eg, a client on VLAN 20 needs to be 
able to connect to the router port on VLAN 20 for ping, DNS, DHCP, 
and so on, but shouldn't be able to see that there's anything on 
VLANs 21, 22, and so on. It's not hard, make the policy drop, and 
allow the access you want, it just makes for a long and repetitive 
rule list.

-- 
Simon Hobson

Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/ for books by acclaimed
author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as
Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create 
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the 
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to