On 12-03-23 11:55 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On 12-03-23 02:11 PM, Ryan on the Beach wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>> I've been using Shorewall for a long time and really like it.  I recently 
>> set up TOS using some of the online documentation and some guides online.  
>> It works great.  However I've run into a new configuration which I'm not 
>> sure how to handle and was hoping some other users could give me some 
>> recommendations.
>> In my other configs I have on an outside and inside interface.  So defining 
>> the rules were fairly straight forward.  However in my latest setup I am 
>> trying to wrap my brain around using traffic shaping when there are two 
>> external interfaces.  One is obviously the external interface and the other 
>> is a tun0 which is the routed OpenVPN interface.  I just don't know how I 
>> should define the interfaces in tcinterfaces, especially since one is really 
>> just a virtual interface.  My main reason for wanting traffic shaping is 
>> because I have VOIP traffic traversing my OpenVPN tunnel along with other 
>> traffic and I wanted to make sure there is always enough bandwidth for the 
>> voice traffic.
>> I am hoping some other users have traffic shaping set up in the same way and 
>> can shed some light on how they handle having a two external interfaces, one 
>> real and one tunnel.
>
> It's actually more complicated than just two external interfaces.  The
> problem is that you want to be able to convey the "importance" (i.e.
> priority) of the voip packets that have been taken off of the VPN and
> wrapped into openvpn's udp packets at the next layer.
>
> That's not currently possible, AFAIK.  Such a thing is possible with
> IPsec AFAIU.
>
> Of course you could just tell the "real network" layer that all openvpn
> traffic has a high (i.e. voip) priority but if somebody starts doing
> some kind of bulk transfer through the VPN you've basically given that
> bulk the same high priority as voip and voided the priority of the voip
> traffic.  Furthermore you end up putting the lower priority traffic on
> the real network behind all openvpn traffic, even if it's bulk.
>
> b.

I guess one workaround could be to establish 2 OpenVPN connections with 
different QoS properties and redirect bulk and voice traffic to one or 
another accordingly.

Michael.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to